What is the main indicator of soil quality. Soil Quality Control Methods: Training Manual

Each is in favor of good water and air quality. Likewise, no one would argue against having good quality soil. The concepts of water quality and air quality have been accepted by both the public and the scientific community. For example, if the water is suitable for drinking or human consumption, it is considered to be of acceptable water quality.

For many, the concept of soil quality is newer and the standard against which soil quality is compared has not been defined either. In fact, the quality of the soil is judged against the intended use of the soil. For this reason, that concept of soil quality is still a bit controversial.

Is the soil quality anyway? Soil quality is "the ability of soil, within land use and ecosystem boundaries, to sustain biological productivity, maintain ecological quality, and maintain animal and human health." environment" tried to define more clearly the concept of soil quality.

The soil as a natural-historical body is a superficial, fertile part of the earth's crust. Its average thickness is 18-20 cm, although in different areas of the land it can be from a few millimeters to 1.5-2 m. For the formation of soil, millennia of interaction, water, air, heat of plant and animal organisms, and especially microorganisms with a soil-forming mountain breed. The most important property of the soil is its fertility, i.e. the ability to provide plants with water, nutrients and air.

The development of this property is facilitated by living organisms (plants, animals, microbes) associated with the soil and together with it making up complex ecological systems. Fertility also largely depends on human activities.

In the process of practical activities, people have a direct and indirect impact on the soil as a natural resource.

When using land for the construction of buildings and industrial facilities, laying roads and water and gas pipelines, a person has a direct impact on the soil. Growing cultivated plants, a person has an indirect effect on the soil, removing organic and mineral substances from the soil along with the crop; by introducing fertilizers into the soil and cultivating it, a person contributes to the restoration of soil fertility.

The soil is the primary source of all material wealth. It provides food, fodder for livestock, fiber for clothing, timber, and so on.

SOIL QUALITY

Soil quality are words used today, not only in the US, but around the world, to describe the ability of soil to produce food and fiber and function as an important asset to the environment. It becomes part of the vocabulary of farmers and ranchers as well as environmentalists, politicians, and researchers. The increase in familiarity and use of the words soil quality reflects the understanding that soil is an essential component of the biosphere. Soil is required for substantial food and fiber production. It also makes a major contribution to supporting the improvement of air and water quality at the local, regional, national, and global level.

By functioning, the soil affects the ecological quality and overall functioning of the biosphere. Soil quality can be broadly defined as the ability of soil to function, within land use and ecosystem boundaries, to sustain biological productivity, to maintain ecological quality. The terms soil quality and soil health are often used interchangeably. Some people prefer soil health because it portrays the soil as a living, dynamic organism that functions, rather than as an inanimate object. Others prefer soil quality and a description of its innate physical, chemical, and biological characteristics. Soil health and soil quality are used interchangeably in this book; however, soil quality tends to be used more frequently due to writers' orientation.

Soil is the basis of the biosphere. Providing the necessary conditions for all life on Earth, the soil, through plants, through animals, indirectly supports the existence of the biosphere. Therefore, a careful attitude to it should be considered as the most important link in a comprehensive (integrated) nature protection. The protection of this invaluable natural resource aims to preserve it forever, constantly maintain and increase fertility.

Specialist Agriculture he is obliged to protect the soil with all his strength and means, to reasonably receive from it everything that it is capable of giving, to fight against its depletion and destruction.

Soil quality affects three essential aspects of sustainable land management:

Productivity of grain crops and livestock. Environmental quality natural resources, and health, animals, and people.

In order to successfully evaluate soil qualitatively, today's researchers are challenging advanced research philosophies and approaches that facilitate holistic, systems-oriented research. Diverse disciplines that span production, environmental quality, and health will be needed to implement such research and produce technologies that can be adapted and used by land managers. Thus, it is not reasonable to expect that we can assess soil quality using only traditional approaches that limit our ability to narrow scientific disciplines. Nor is it reasonable that such research could be entirely successful without the involvement of agricultural producers.

The importance of assessing soil quality to agriculture was highlighted in the Research Council's national report, Agenda for Agriculture. This study concluded that, “Protecting soil quality, like protection of air and water quality, should be a fundamental goal of national environmental policies. international recognition.During the last 5 years, enterprises mainly deal with the problems of soil quality and lack of quality, especially soil biomaterial.The Regional Technical Committee on "Soil Quality" formed a sub-committee in September 1992. The purpose of the committee was to put together as much information as possible as far as possible about different soils, physical, chemical, and biological properties are very essential in assessing soil quality and provide standardized methods for assessing soil quality. soil quality index data. The disciplinary perspective of this approach was expanded in 1993 when the NC-174 Regional Technical Committee on "The Impact of Accelerated Erosion on Soil Properties and Productivity" joined NCR-59 as a partner in the development of this book on soil quality methods and approaches.

There are two unique methods in order to assess the quality of the soil. The first is to evaluate soil in relation to the impact of nutrients on, animals, and humans, and farmer-based approaches to assessing soil quality. Second, many scholars are highlighting preliminary case studies that distinguish between land use and the impact of management on soil quality; synthesize possible soil quality indices; and demonstrate educational tools and techniques to increase knowledge and understanding about soil quality and the role of international federations in the biosphere.

The approaches presented in this book provide a unique illustration of how research methods can be made transferable and relevant to agricultural producers and the general public. The authors include agricultural and environmental studies. Many have already made significant contributions in this area.

THE IMPORTANCE OF SOIL QUALITY

Soil, water, and air are the three main natural resources on which life largely depends. The balance between economic viability or destruction often depends on how we manage our soil resource base. For example, soil provides nutrients for plant growth that are essential for animal and human food. This provides an environment for the recycling and detoxification of organic materials and for the recycling of many nutrients and global gases. Healthy soil provides a link between plant, animal, and human health. History has repeatedly shown that mismanagement of the primary resource of soil can lead to poverty, malnutrition, and economic disaster.

Many nations have been looking for methods of conserving and protecting the main resource of soil, to protect and preserve the main resource of food, and to maintain air and water quality is one of the main tasks; however, soil resources continue to deteriorate due to erosion, loss of biological activity, and an increase in toxic elements. Although national programs such as monitoring, inventory of national resources accounting for erosion, a more comprehensive approach and this approach is needed to change the qualitative indicators.

SOIL ASSESSMENT

Soil appraisal is a comparative assessment of soil quality in terms of fertility at comparable levels of agricultural technology and farming intensity. It establishes the relative suitability of soils according to the main factors of natural fertility for the cultivation of agricultural crops, providing the allocation of agricultural production groups of soils that are subject to economic evaluation.

Soil appraisal is a logical continuation of complex land surveys and precedes their economic assessment. The main purpose of appraisal is to determine the relative merit of soils in terms of their fertility, i.e., to establish how many times one soil is better or worse than another in terms of its natural and stably acquired properties. The object of appraisal is the soil, expressed by strictly defined taxonomic units, established on the basis of soil survey materials.

The criteria for assessing soils are their natural diagnostic features and traits acquired in the process of long-term cultivation that affect the productivity of the main grain, industrial and other crops, and when assessing fodder lands, they affect the productivity of hayfields and pastures.

Identical groups of soils during appraisal should receive the same performance indicators. To determine these indicators, a soil grading scale is compiled, which is a system of digital data corresponding to certain values ​​of the measured values ​​of natural indicators for various soil groups. In this case, two scales are usually compiled: one - according to soil properties, the second - according to productivity.

The main diagnostic features include: the thickness of the humus horizon, the percentage of humus, silt and physical clay in the soil, the gross reserves of humus, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in the soil, mechanical composition, acidity, the amount of absorbed bases, the degree of saturation of the soil with bases, etc. The choice of diagnostic features is made for each land assessment area on the basis of a comprehensive study of the soil cover, data on crop yields, and determination of the influence of individual soil factors on crop yields.

The evaluation of soils within the boundaries of the land assessment area is carried out in the following sequence:

1) determination of average values ​​of indicators characterizing individual features and properties of soils;

2) determination of the average long-term yield of the main agricultural crops on various soils;

3) selection of the main diagnostic features;

Land valuation methods

The monetary valuation process is applied to develop sound methods for determining the value of a land plot or its property based on special procedures that reflect three distinct methods of data analysis: value, comparison of sales data and capitalization of income. The approaches that are applied depend on the type of value, the methods that are used to assess the quality and quantity of data.

All three approaches can be used to solve many evaluation problems, but one or more will be more important for this particular task. The most common (and legally approved) for the valuation of agricultural land today is an approach based on the capitalization of income. But in the case of peer review, as a rule, two approaches are used.

Cost Based Approach:

Based on the understanding that the buyer and seller associate value with the cost of developing and developing the land (land improvements). In this approach, the cost is determined by the sum of the estimated cost of land to the current costs that are associated with expanding production or replacing what is already on the ground. This approach is quite effective in assessing new land properties that are developed or the development of which is provided for in accordance with the best and most efficient use of land.

Approach based on comparison of land sale data:

This approach is most effective if a number of similar land properties have recently been sold or are in given time put up for sale. Based on this approach, the land appraiser determines the appraised value by comparing similar land plots and rights to them. This approach is used in a developed and active land market, if reliable information on the sale of the appraisal is available. The sale price of land plots, which is considered the highest measure, indicates the range in which the estimated value of the assessed land value will lie.

The appraiser determines the degree of germination or difference between the land that is being assessed, as well as the rights to it and the corresponding sales, taking into account the different elements, comparison processes, the rights of the owners, including those transferred; financial conditional, market conditions; terms of sale;

location; physical and economic characteristics;

purpose and mode of use; non-land cost components. The cash value or percentage adjustment is then applied to the sale price of any matched land, plus the applicable percentages. With the help of this comparative procedure, the appraiser of the land evaluates its value for a certain specific time.

Income capitalization approach:

Based on the determination of the present value of the future cumulative benefit that is associated with the ownership of the property. Income that may be received from landed property and the value of its resale upon passing to the previous owner may be capitalized into the current simultaneous value.

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LAND VALUATION.

The concept of land valuation is closely related to such a concept as the economic valuation of land, which is understood as the valuation of land as a natural resource and means of production in agriculture and forestry, as well as a natural basis in social production in terms of indicators characterizing land productivity, their efficiency. use and yield per unit area.

An economic assessment of lands for various purposes is carried out for a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of their use.

The data of the economic valuation of land are the basis for the monetary valuation of a land plot for various purposes, therefore, when considering the value of a monetary valuation, it is necessary to take into account its connection with the economic valuation of land.

Economic and monetary valuation are the final part of the state land cadastre. These types of assessments give a quantitative description of soil fertility, which is objectively formed according to economic indicators.

The regulation of production relations in the field of land use shows that the economic valuation of land in relative terms (points, cadastral hectares) is not exhaustive, since it characterizes not the absolute, but the relative value of the land, the absolute value of the land must have a monetary expression.

With private ownership of land, the price of land is needed mainly for fiscal purposes, it reflects the value of land as a commodity. Determining the comparative value of land in monetary terms is necessary to solve economic tasks related to the organization of the rational use of land resources, protection and renewal of land.

The rational use of land is based on a management system, reflects the production relations that have developed in society and are dictated by economic requirements. One of the important issues of this management is the economic protection of land from irrational use on the one hand, and stimulation of intensive, but without deterioration of properties, land use. The tool for solving these problems is the monetary valuation of land.

In monetary terms, there are two main areas:

  1. 1. Evaluation of land as a mode of production.
  2. 2. Evaluation of land when changing its intended purpose, i.e. when it is withdrawn for state and social needs.

In addition to these two areas for economic calculations, it is also advisable to have the prospect of a monetary valuation, which would take into account the peculiarities of development public relations and the time factor.

The object of monetary characteristics, i.e. monetary value of land as a resource of human activity, are lands of all categories, land ownership, land use, including reserve lands, which are at the disposal of the Soviets of People's Deputies. However, with the peculiarities of use in the assessment, lands are distinguished, which are the main means of production and the spatial operating basis for the placement of farm facilities.

The materials of the monetary valuation of land include the initial data on the size of the differential rent: coefficients of a comparable area in conditional cadastral hectares; area of ​​agricultural land for the accounting year indicators of the monetary value of a hectare different types agricultural land indicators of monetary value certain types and the entire area of ​​agricultural land. When assessing land by administrative districts at the intra-regional level, the materials are supplemented with assessment indicators for soil soils and data on the cost of land development.

LAND VALUATION INDICATORS

The object of the economic evaluation of land is the unified state land fund of the country, represented by various categories of land and land, which are characterized by different soil cover. It is known that the results of agricultural production are influenced by both subjective and objective factors. But if subjective factors can be eliminated by appropriate organizational and economic measures, then the objective ones have to be taken into account when planning and organizing production, as well as when evaluating the results. economic activity enterprises. In the economic evaluation of land, only objective factors are taken into account, which, first of all, include the quality of the land. In the economic evaluation of land, it must be taken into account that such additional costs as an increased dose of fertilizer application, sowing with selected varietal seeds, better tillage, etc., should not be taken into account, and here is why. Their impact on labor productivity is not directly related to the property of the soil. Consequently, it is necessary to take into account only those costs that have already changed (altered) the soil, for example, by reclamation or another type of cultivation, that is, which have already organically merged with the natural fertility of the soil and have become inseparable from it.

When assessing land, soil, being a carrier of fertility and the subject of assessment, is considered as a single concept because, first, during the appraisal of soils, an assessment of natural fertility is made, and then, during an economic assessment, economic fertility is determined, which takes into account objective economic factors. Therefore, in the economic evaluation of land, a single type of land-valuation unit is chosen. In different periods of land appraisal work, soil varieties, agricultural production groups of soils, agricultural land types, and cadastral land types were taken as such a unit. In accordance with the current methodology for assessing land, the main assessment unit is soil groups identified in accordance with the generally accepted classification for characterizing and accounting for land quality. When the necessary information is provided, the land valuation units can be smaller taxonomic units - soil varieties.

Land use is expressed not only in the level of production, but also in the nature of the use of individual land plots, which is reflected in the composition of agricultural land. The specificity of the economic use of individual lands determines some features of their assessment. The economic assessment of land occupied by perennial fruit plantations is carried out in specialized farms and areas with developed fruit growing and viticulture, taking into account the requirements of individual species, breeds and varieties of plantations for relief, climate, soil conditions on which fruit plantations are located. Therefore, the evaluation group of soils as a subject of evaluation of lands occupied by perennial plantations is characterized by the homogeneity of the genetic type of soil suitable for one breed, variety, age and maturation period of perennial plantations. Perennial plantings are evaluated at the fruiting age according to the yield of products, taking into account its quality and production costs. In non-specialized farms, but having marketable horticulture and viticulture (more than 3% of marketable agricultural products), perennial plantations can be evaluated by species and groups of varieties, depending on the availability of initial information. According to pome breeds, summer, autumn and winter or summer-autumn and winter groups varieties, for grapes - table and technical varieties. If the area of ​​perennial plantations is insignificant and their products have no commercial value, the lands occupied by perennial plantations are evaluated according to the scales for the general assessment of arable land.

Natural grasslands (hayfields and pastures) are valued as a general land assessment for productivity, cost recovery and differential income. Productivity is expressed in feed units and the value of gross output. When assessing natural fodder lands, an assessment group of soils was taken as the subject of assessment, which is characterized by the uniformity of soil cover, topography, moisture conditions, features of vegetation cover and crops of technical condition. Depending on the availability of initial information and production needs, geobotanical sections on certain estimated groups of soils can be taken as units for assessing forage lands. Production costs on natural fodder lands are established according to the annual reports of agricultural enterprises or by the standard calculation method. The costs of performing cultural and technical work on superficial and fundamental improvement, fertilization, hay harvesting, etc. are subject to accounting.

Of great importance for the economic evaluation of land is right choice assessment indicators. They must be objective and have a certain practical value. Only in this case, the results of land assessment will be widely used in production conditions. The calculation of indicators is carried out separately for non-reclaimed, irrigated and drained lands.

Various aspects of the economic evaluation of land, based on specific tasks and purposes, should have different indicators. The general economic evaluation of land is carried out according to the value of gross output, cost recovery, differential income. A private appraisal of the land, according to the efficiency of cultivation of individual crops, should be carried out according to the yield of the respective crops, the cost recovery for their cultivation and the differential income.

From an economic point of view, the quality of land as the main means of production is determined by the fertility of the soil. Differences in soil fertility lead to different crop yields. Consequently, productivity acts as an initial indicator of the economic evaluation of land. According to the yield data, it is possible to establish the appropriate numerical ratios and provide a comparative assessment of the quality of the land. The composition of agricultural crops selected for the economic evaluation of land should be characteristic of the territory of the land evaluation area. The mandatory list includes agricultural crops of great industrial and commercial importance, and primarily the main grain crops, winter wheat, barley, sunflower, and corn.

Productivity as an indicator of land assessment is of great practical importance in solving many issues of agricultural production. However, the crop yield reflects the quality of the land only at equal costs for its production.

The complexity of the economic evaluation of land in terms of crop yields lies in the fact that the yield of a single crop cannot provide complete information about the quality of land. With a wide variety of agricultural crops in agricultural enterprises, the assessment of land by productivity is carried out by converting heterogeneous products into fodder units, which is associated with certain conventions. The most accurate co-measurement of the yield of various agricultural crops can be their cost expression by determining the value of gross output and differential income. The cost of gross output includes the main, associated and used part of by-products.

The cost of gross output is determined for all crops, taking into account the area under crops, yields and prices. The productivity of the land, expressed in the form of productivity and the cost of gross output, characterizes the absolute level of economic fertility of the soil at equal costs per unit area. Evaluation of lands by their productivity provides obtaining coefficients of production growth per unit of additional costs on lands of different quality. The results of such an assessment can be used in planning yields, determining production volumes and distribution of agricultural products.

In the economic evaluation of land, the output of gross output on land of different quality must be linked to production costs. It should be borne in mind that only the amount of production related to equal production costs, or the size of equal costs per unit of production, reflects the quality of the land. The difference in land quality is determined by the efficiency of equal costs invested in land of unequal quality.

Gross product at the achieved level of intensity of agriculture and the total costs of obtaining it reflect the level of production and the absolute fertility of the land. The difference in the mass of products produced on lands of different quality at equal costs is the result of differences in the productivity of agricultural labor and reflects differences in land quality.

crystalline hydrates, as well as partially and occluded water. On the other hand, during evaporation and drying, all organic substances volatile with water vapor, dissolved gases, as well as CO 2 from hydrocarbons are removed, which will then turn into carbonates.

If the residue was dried at 178-182°C, then the occluded water will be removed completely. Water of crystallization will also be removed, but some may remain,

especially when sulfates are present in the sample. Bicarbonates will turn into carbonates, but the latter may partially decompose to form oxides or oxysalts. A slight loss of nitrates may occur. organic matter lost more than in the first case.

Drying at 178-182°C should be preferred when analyzing waters containing predominantly inorganic salts, since then the result obtained approaches more closely the sum of the results of individual determinations of cations and anions in the sample.

24. Soil as an object of analysis. Sources of soil pollution. Criteria and indicators of soil quality.

Soil and soils provide a medium for the production of food and clothing, as well as a source of drinking water. In addition, the earth is the environment where we are destined to live. That is why clean land - clean soil and soil - is so important for human health.

The soil is constantly under the influence of human activities, represented in the form of agricultural production, industry, mining of various minerals, landfills, accumulation of pollutants that are formed primarily in atmospheric emissions during the production of heat and energy, industrial activities, traffic, waste burning, etc. P. Deterioration of soil quality or contamination with chemicals harmful to human health can occur as a result of exposure to any of these human activities.

In addition to reckless soil management (use of pesticides and disposal of waste in landfills), impacts are noted mainly as an undesirable result of a wide range of activities, including releases and leaks of chemicals, as well as the accumulation of an increasing number of pollutants generated and distributed in the air.

Soil is the richest natural resource of any country

mmol-equiv/l). The hardness of surface waters is subject to noticeable seasonal fluctuations, usually reaching the highest value at the end of winter and the lowest during the flood period.

High hardness worsens the organoleptic properties of water, giving it a bitter taste and affecting the digestive organs. The value of the total hardness in drinking water should not exceed 10.0 mmol-eq / l. Water hardness is expressed as the number of mmol-eq of calcium and magnesium in 1 liter of water.

The total hardness is determined by complexometric titration. Complexometric titration is based on the formation of complex compounds of metal ions with inorganic and organic ligands. The most widely used complexometric titration, which uses special reagents - complex - derivatives of aminopolycarboxylic acids. Most often, complexon III is used as a titrant - disodium salt of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid Na 2 H 2 Y - EDTA (trilon B). Schematically, the formation of a complex compound can be represented as follows Me 2+ + H 2 Y 2 - = MeY 2 + 2H + ; Me 3+ + H 2 Y 2 - = MeY - + 2H +; Me 4+ + H 2 Y 2 \u003d MeY + 2H +.

These equations show that one metal atom, regardless of its valency, binds one complex molecule. Titration with complexone III should be carried out when determining

There are several methods for disposal of dehydrated sludge:

    burial in special places, while the sediment should not penetrate into groundwater;

    composting together with municipal solid waste;

    incineration (the disadvantage of this method is atmospheric pollution);

    use as fertilizers (the disadvantage of the method is the problem of heavy metals).

So the cleaning problem Wastewater generates, in turn, new problems, forming a vicious circle. Unfortunately, there are not so many alternatives to this. In addition to the introduction of new production technologies that do not pollute water, it is necessary to improve methods that exclude the discharge of industrial effluents into rivers and lakes; improve wastewater treatment by solving the problem of disposal of by-products.

Water pollution by radioactive substances poses a great danger. Scales river pollution, lakes take on such dimensions that the latter lose their ability to self-purify. Pollution of water systems is a greater danger than air pollution. This is explained by the following reasons:

    the processes of regeneration and self-purification proceed in the aquatic environment more slowly than in the air;

    sources of water pollution are more diverse;

natural processes carried out in the aquatic environment exposed to pollution are more sensitive

    thermal barriers are formed on the ways of fish migrations;

    species diversity decreases.

Experts have established that in order to prevent irreversible violations of the ecological balance, the temperature of the water in the reservoir in the summer as a result of the discharge of polluted waters should not rise by more than 3 ° C compared to average monthly temperature hottest year in 10 years.

2. Organoleptic indicators. Organoleptic indicators include color, turbidity, smell, taste and taste, foaminess. International standards ISO 6658 and others set specific requirements for tasters and tasting methods. For example, there are three qualification levels for tasters: consultant, qualified consultant and expert. Before the study of smell and taste, preliminary tests of a sample free of foreign smell or taste are carried out, and such a sample is included in a series of analyzed samples as a coded sample.

Chroma- a natural property of natural water, due to the presence of humic substances and complex iron compounds. The color of water can be determined by the properties and structure of the bottom of the reservoir, the nature of aquatic vegetation, soils adjacent to the reservoir,

character is divided into two groups, describing it subjectively according to their feelings:

    natural origin (from living and dead organisms, from the influence of soils, aquatic vegetation): earthy, putrefactive, moldy, grassy, ​​etc.

    artificial origin. Such odors usually change significantly during water treatment: petroleum products, acetic, phenolic, etc.

The odor intensity is evaluated on a 5-point scale (GOST 3351). For drinking water, an odor of no more than 2 points is allowed.

Smell Intensity

The nature of the manifestation

intensity

The smell is not felt

The smell is not immediately felt, but is detected upon careful examination.

The smell is noticeable if you pay attention to it

conspicuous

The smell is easily noticed and causes disapproval of water

distinct

The smell attracts attention and makes you refrain from drinking

The smell is so strong that it makes the water unusable

insoluble or colloidal particles of various origins. The turbidity of the water also determines some other characteristics of the water:

    The presence of sediment, which may be absent, insignificant, noticeable, large, very large (mm).

    Suspended substances, or coarsely dispersed impurities, are determined gravimetrically after filtering the sample, by the weight gain of the dried filter. This indicator is usually not very informative and is important mainly for wastewater.

    Transparency, measured as the height of a column of water through which a standard font can be seen on white paper.

Turbidity is determined photometrically or visually - according to the degree of turbidity of a column 10-12 cm high. In the latter case, the sample is qualitatively described as follows: transparent, slightly opalescent, opalescent, slightly cloudy, cloudy, very cloudy (GOST 1030).

foaminess the ability of water to retain artificially created foam is considered. This indicator can be used to qualitatively assess the presence of substances such as natural and artificial surfactants. Foaminess is determined mainly in the analysis of waste and polluted natural waters. The test is positive if the foam persists for more than 1 minute (pH 6.5 -8.5).

3. pH. For all living things in water, the minimum possible pH value is 5, rain having a pH<5,5, считается кислотным. В питьевой

of the above are determined by phenolphthalein, the second - by methyl orange.

The alkalinity of natural waters due to their contact with atmospheric air and limestone is mainly due to the content of bicarbonates and carbonates in them, which make a significant contribution to the mineralization of water. Compounds of the first group can also be found in waste and contaminated surface waters.

Similar to alkalinity, sometimes, mainly in the analysis of waste and process water, determine acidity water. The acidity of water is due to the content in water of substances that react with hydroxoanions. These connections include:

    Strong acids: hydrochloric (HCl), nitric (HNO 3), sulfuric (H 2 SO 4).

    Weak acids: acetic (CH 3 COOH), sulfurous (H 2 SO 3), carbonic (H 2 CO 3), hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S), etc.

    Cations of weak bases: ammonium (NH 4 +), cations of organic ammonium compounds.

The acidity of a water sample is measured in mol-eq / l or mmol-eq / l and is determined by the amount of strong alkali (usually KOH or NaOH solutions with a concentration of 0.05 or 0.1 mol-eq / l) are used to neutralize the solution. Similarly to the alkalinity index, free and total acidity are distinguished.

pass into carbonates, which precipitate, carbonate hardness is called temporary or removable. The hardness remaining after boiling is called constant. The results of the determination of hardness are usually expressed in mmol-eq / l.

Under natural conditions, ions of calcium, magnesium and other alkaline earth metals that cause hardness enter the water as a result of the interaction of dissolved carbon dioxide with carbonate minerals and other processes of dissolution and chemical weathering of rocks. The source of these ions is also microbiological processes occurring in soils in the catchment area, in bottom sediments, as well as wastewater from various enterprises.

Water hardness varies widely. Water with a hardness of less than 4 mmol-eq/l is considered soft, from 4 to 8 mmol-eq/l - medium hardness, from 8 to 12 mmol-eq/l - hard and above 12 mmol-eq/l - very hard. The total hardness ranges from units to tens, sometimes hundreds of mmol-eq/l, and the carbonate hardness is up to 70-80% of the total hardness. Hardness due to calcium ions usually predominates (up to 70%); however, in some cases, magnesium hardness can reach 50-60%. The hardness of sea water and oceans is much higher (tens and hundreds

lennom pH of the solution, tk. this determines the stability of the complex, as well as the change in the color of the indicator. The required pH value of the medium is created by adding buffer solutions. To indicate the end point of the titration in the method of complexometry, metal-chromic indicators are used (eriochrome black T, murexide, xylenol orange, etc.). These indicators form complexes with metal ions that are less stable than the complex of a metal ion with EDTA. Therefore, at the end of the titration, complexone III displaces the indicator from its complex with the metal (the metal binds to a more stable complex with EDTA). In this case, the color changes, the solution turns into a color characteristic of the indicator at a given pH of the solution.

6. Dry residue is the mass of the residue obtained by evaporating the filtered water sample and dried at 103-105°C or 178-182°C.

This value should express the total amount of substances dissolved in the sample, inorganic and organic. The results obtained, however, satisfy this requirement only approximately, at whichever of these two temperatures the residue is dried.

If the residue was dried at 103-105°C, then it will retain all or almost all of the water of crystallization of the salts forming

and, first of all, it is a bridge between animate and inanimate nature. It consists of products of weathering and decay of bedrock, water, organic matter, and various gases. Thousands of different microorganisms and insects live in it, maintaining the ecological balance of undisturbed soils. Improper exploitation of the soil causes its irrevocable destruction due to mining, salinization, industrial waste pollution and, finally, erosion. Natural soil erosion proceeds slowly, but under the influence of economic activity, soil erosion increases many times over. As a result of erosion, 27% of agricultural land has been lost over 100 years. Deforestation contributes to soil destruction.

The most common is water erosion, which causes enormous damage to the economy. This form of erosion is typical of areas where improper tillage practices are practiced. The annual washout of soil on the globe reaches 25 billion tons. This soil ends up in rivers and then in the oceans. The decrease in the productivity of agricultural land and the accumulation of sedimentary material in the lower reaches of the rivers leads to a complication of navigation, floods, and flooding of reservoirs. A serious cause of soil erosion can be storm flows, strong winds, prolonged droughts, which, however, are not the main danger. Erosion occurs, as a rule, due to the introduction of agricultural systems

production, designed without taking into account the susceptibility of soils to washout or deflation. Therefore, the problem of protecting soils from erosion is closely connected with the problems of overcoming backwardness in agriculture.

Sources of pollution. Soil, unlike air and water, is most heavily polluted. Various physical, chemical and biological processes take place in the soil, which are disturbed as a result of pollution. Soil pollution is associated with air and water pollution. Solid and liquid industrial, agricultural and domestic wastes enter the soil. The main pollutants are metals and their compounds, radioactive substances, fertilizers and pesticides.

Industrial and commercial activities for a long time lead to the formation of a large number of contaminated areas. Poor handling of chemicals and petroleum products results in the release and leakage of chemicals and petroleum products into the surrounding soil and soil.

Most of the contaminated sites are located in urban areas, which creates a potential threat to the local population due to soil and ground contamination. Moreover, residential buildings were built in these areas at a time when there were no serious reasons for general concern about soil pollution problems, so the construction was carried out without observing any protective measures against the effects of harmful substances.

The following sources of soil pollution can be identified:

absorbed by plants. In the latter case, these substances also penetrate the soil.

    Spread of pollution formed in the air.

Soil quality, especially in urban areas, is affected by air emissions from vehicle operation, waste and fuel combustion in thermal and power plants. The impact of pollution on the state of the air basin is determined by the diffusion of pollutants over vast areas of urban areas. Some of these pollutants pose a risk to human health (especially children's health) due to the presence of heavy metals (mainly lead) in them, as well as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the surface soil layer. It is assumed that an area of ​​about 200 km 2 is exposed to pollution accumulated from the air. Of this area, it is estimated that approximately 20 km 2 is used for socially significant needs - for the construction of housing, kindergartens and public sports and entertainment areas.

Self-purification of soils practically does not occur, toxic substances accumulate, contributing to a change in the chemical composition of soils. From the soil, toxic substances through food enter the human body and cause various diseases. Heavy metals also accumulate in soils: mercury, lead, copper, iron, chromium, etc. A large amount of waste is generated during mining. big

consumption of contaminated fish; through water for bathing; use of textiles produced from agricultural raw materials (linen and cotton).

The most serious ways of external influence are: ingress of soil into the digestive system (children); skin contact with soil; inhalation of air vapors (evaporation in indoor areas); contact with drinking water; consumption of agricultural products from contaminated soils.

The routes of external influences listed above are considered first of all, and soil quality criteria are established taking into account the direct impact of the soil (ingestion through the digestive system and (or) skin contacts with the soil).

Soil quality criteria designed to impact particularly vulnerable and sensitive groups of land users, such as private horticulture and horticulture, kindergartens or sports and recreation and playgrounds. The focus on protecting babies is due to the fact that children are considered the most vulnerable group that is exposed to soil (direct ingestion of soil, contact through hands and mouth), and also because exposure to some chemical pollutants may be biologically more sensitive than for an adult. The calculation of soil quality criteria is based on standard input data. Another factor in establishing criteria for soil quality was the ability to bioaccumulate substances in the soil.

the notification relates to activities in relation to such sites. However, despite indications of small amounts of contaminants in vegetables grown in lightly contaminated soil, notifications and recommendations are given to stop growing vegetables in contaminated areas, because it is almost impossible to grow them without open ground that directly affects people. especially for children.

Threshold limits can only be used for immobile and sufficiently persistent chemicals and are only defined for the group of 10 metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

The cut-off value and performance criterion are identical where the performance criterion has been set to prevent acute toxic effects. The limit threshold may be ten times higher than the quality criterion for those cases where the soil quality criterion is set to prevent toxic chronic exposure. The main idea is that, in general, public information and risk reduction measures should result in a reduction in average toxic exposure to children. However, these measures will not necessarily provide protection for single cases of severe exposure to soil by ingestion. This means that the limit threshold cannot be increased from the value of the performance criterion if the basis for setting the performance criterion is

An important role in the analysis of soils is played by remote methods, which make it possible to obtain data on large-scale changes. These are methods using space means - satellites "Meteor", "Meteor-Nature", in the USA - "Landsat". Already in the 70s of the last century, images were received from the Soviet Meteor satellite, which made it possible to fairly accurately judge the change in the state of pasture vegetation in the republics of Central Asia. Extensive information about various natural resources, processes occurring on the surface of the Earth, comes from other space systems. Significant results in the assessment of anthropogenic impacts were obtained on the basis of the integrated use of information provided by space, ground-based systems, and aerial photography.

The information received from satellites and used in the organization of environmental monitoring also includes data on the state of forests, agricultural land, vegetation on land, phytoplankton at sea, the earth's surface, redistribution of water resources, pollution of the atmosphere, seas and land. To obtain such information, for example, satellites of the Meteor-Priroda system are equipped with multispectral scanners, spectrometers and microwave radiometers, which are capable of isolating aerosol plumes of anthropogenic origin in the area of ​​cities and industrial centers, places of surface contamination

25. Air as an object of analysis. Sources of air pollution. Criteria for sanitary and hygienic assessment of the air condition. Methods for determining pollutants in the atmosphere. Determination of inorganic and organic compounds.

The atmosphere is a part of the biosphere and is a gaseous form. the shell of the Earth, rotating with it as a whole. This shell is layered. Each layer has its own name and characteristic physical and chemical features. Conventionally, the atmosphere is divided into two large components: upper and lower. Of greatest interest to us is the lower part of the atmosphere, mainly the troposphere, since it is where the main meteorological phenomena that affect pollution occur. atmospheric air.

The troposphere contains most of the cosmic and anthropogenic dust, water vapor, nitrogen, oxygen and inert gases. It is practically transparent to short-wave solar radiation passing through it. At the same time, the water vapor, carbon dioxide and ozone contained in it quite strongly absorb the thermal radiation of our planet, as a result of which the troposphere heats up. This heating causes vertical movement of air currents, condensation of water vapor, formation of clouds and precipitation. The distribution of temperatures in the surface layer of the atmosphere is the most important reason for the formation of the climate and its characteristics. The composition of the gases of the lower part of the atmosphere

allowable concentrations in the atmospheric air of more than 500 substances.

Hygienic standards should provide a physiological optimum for human life, and in this regard, high demands are made on the quality of atmospheric air in our country. In view of the fact that short-term exposure to harmful substances that are not detected by smell can cause functional changes in the cerebral cortex and in the visual analyzer, the values ​​of maximum single maximum allowable concentrations (MAC mr) are introduced. permissible concentrations (MPC cc).

Thus, for each substance, two standards are established: the maximum single maximum allowable concentration (MPC mr) (averaged over 20-30 minutes) in order to prevent reflex reactions in humans and the average daily maximum allowable concentration (MPC cc) in order to prevent general toxic, mutagenic, carcinogenic and other effects with unlimited long-term breathing.

The values ​​of MPC mr and MPC ss for the most common impurities in the atmospheric air are given in Table. 7. In the rightmost column of the table, the hazard classes of substances are given. These classes are designed for continuous inhalation of substances without changing their concentration over time. In real conditions, significant increases in impurity concentrations are possible, which can lead to

hygienic hazard of a substance, you can use the indicator of the approximate-safe maximum single level of air pollution (SHPL).

Methods for determining pollutants in the atmosphere. To determine particulate matter in the air, instrumental methods are used based on measuring the optical properties of air, which are measured in units of visibility (km) or transparency (µg/m3). To measure the opacity coefficient - the reflection coefficient (pollution) requires fairly simple equipment. For automatic analysis of gas mixtures with high reflection coefficients and high sensitivity, gas analyzers based on optical-acoustic spectroscopy are used. A discretely tunable CO 2 laser produces a beam of light that is interrupted and passed through a cuvette containing an air sample. The setup is equipped with IR detectors connected to an electronic signal recording system and a mini-computer. The limit of detection is 10 -7%. Air quality analysis is based on the collection of particles from aerosols or air by filtration to determine mass concentration and composition. For this, large volume samplers with filters made of glass fiber or inert cellulose esters with pore sizes from 8 to 0.01 µm are used. Continuous sampling lasts from 24 hours to 1 month. This is how average results are obtained. Even within 24 hours, the composition of the sample may change as weather conditions change. For example, rain increases humidity,

capable of harming human health, animals, vegetation, or causing a deterioration in the aesthetic perception of the environment (for example, in the presence of dust, dirt, unpleasant odors or lack of sunlight as a result of air smoke). Since all living things very slowly adapt to these new microcomponents, chemicals serve as an objective factor in adverse effects on the natural environment and human health.

Sources of air pollution. Discharge of pollutants can be carried out in various environments: atmosphere, water, soil. Emissions to the atmosphere are the main sources of subsequent pollution of waters and soils on a regional scale, and in some cases on a global scale.

Industrial sources of atmospheric air pollution are divided into sources of emission and sources of emissions. The former include technological devices (installation devices, etc.), during the operation of which impurities are released. To the second - pipes, ventilation shafts, aeration lamps and other devices with the help of which the admixture enters the atmosphere.

Industrial emissions are divided into organized and unorganized. Organized industrial emissions enter the atmosphere through specially constructed gas ducts, air ducts and pipes, which makes it possible to use appropriate installations for purification from pollutants. unorganized

    Residential buildings and household enterprises. This is mainly household and construction waste, food waste, feces, waste from heating systems, waste from public institutions (hospitals, canteens, shops, etc.).

    Industrial enterprises. Solid and liquid industrial wastes contain certain substances that have a toxic effect. These are salts of non-ferrous and heavy metals, cyanides, compounds of arsenic, beryllium, wastes of benzene, phenol, methanol, etc.

    Thermal power engineering. The formation of slag during the combustion of coal, as well as the release into the atmosphere of soot, sulfur oxides, which ultimately end up in the soil.

    Agriculture. Fertilizers, pesticides used in agriculture and forestry to protect plants from pests and diseases.

Intensive use of agricultural land leads to deterioration of soil quality. The applied pesticides, applied sludge and fertilizers have an impact on the state of agricultural land. The use of pesticides on farmland is considered a problem due to the risk of surface leaching and contamination infiltrating into groundwater. The accumulation of heavy metals in the topsoil can be a direct or indirect source of threat to human health.

    Transport. During the operation of internal combustion engines, oxides of nitrogen, carbon, lead, hydrocarbons and other substances are released that settle on the soil or

the amount of waste is also obtained during the enrichment of phosphate raw materials. Thermal power plants produce 70 million tons of ash and slag per year. Annual costs for the maintenance and operation of ash dumps amount to tens of millions of rubles.

MPC standards for soil pollution have not yet been finally established. However, a wide range of pollutants can already be determined using chemical, physical and other methods.

Impact on a person. The degree of human exposure to environmental factors present in soil and soil (harmful chemicals) depends on the degree of land use, the concentration of pollution in soil and soil, and the degree of risk of pollution of other environmental components (groundwater and air).

Ways of influence of environmental factors of the soil can be divided into two types: direct impact and indirect or indirect impact.

Direct exposure to soil and soil pollutants through: ingestion of soil particles (dust), skin contact, inhalation of soil/dust particles, inhalation of substances evaporating from the soil (especially indoors).

Indirect (indirect) impact through: consumption of contaminated crops grown on contaminated soils; consumption of contaminated livestock products (from animals bred on contaminated soils); consumption of contaminated drinking water (direct drinking, skin contact, inhalation of aerosols);

For urban areas, the quality criteria are usually exceeded for several substances (especially lead and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons). Therefore, a new indicator has been introduced in the soil regulations for cases of land use for particularly sensitive needs and vulnerable groups of the population, the so-called “limit threshold”.

If the value of the maximum threshold concentration is exceeded in areas used for residential development, children's institutions or children's and sports and recreation areas, then measures must be taken to eliminate pollution. If the concentration of pollutants is between the limiting threshold value and the indicator of the quality criterion, then the local authorities inform and explain the situation to the public, landowners and land users of the territory.

The aim of this approach is to define sanitary and epidemiological requirements and measures to eliminate the impact of pollution through the soil and thereby achieve the same level of protection that is usually provided when soil quality criteria are met. The discrepancy between the limiting threshold value of the pollutant concentration and the indicator of the quality criterion is called the "residential notification interval".

The basic principle is to avoid open, bare areas of the ground surface, which in such a case can lead to direct exposure of the soil to children,

soil adopted a sharp strong toxic effects of the pollutant.

Soil quality indicators. Almost always there is a need to determine soil moisture. To do this, a sample of soil is placed in a beaker and adjusted to constant weight. For clayey, high-humus soils with high humidity, 15-20 g of soil are selected, a sample of organic soils is 15-50 g. The determination is carried out twice, the heating temperature is 105 ± 2°C for 8 hours. Sandy soils are heated for 3 hours at 105 ± 2°C, gypsum soils are heated for 8 hours at 80 ± 2°C. The duration of subsequent drying is 1 hour for sandy soils and 2 hours for other soils.

When concentrating the substances under study by extracting them from the soil with liquid solvents, the concentration of the substance in the soil is calculated by the formula C = a V 1 /V in, where a- the content of the substance found in the test volume of the solution, μg; V1 V - volume of sample solution taken for analysis, ml; in- mass of the studied soil, g.

If the analyte in the sample solution is defined as a concentration (µg/ml), then the concentration of the substance in the soil (C, mg/kg) is calculated using the formula C = a V/v, where a- concentration of the analyte in the sample solution, µg/ml; V - volume of the test sample, ml; in - mass of the studied soil, g.

waters, etc. Data from the Salyut and Mir space stations make it possible to interpret the received information in a qualified manner and photograph the fields of anthropogenic impacts, including pollution. It is shown that under certain meteorological conditions the territory of Europe is covered with a haze of anthropogenic presence. Anthropogenic changes on land are caused not only by the impact of pollution, but also by total urbanization, the expansion of agricultural land, deforestation, and open mining. With the help of satellite imagery, the total effect of anthropogenicity is determined, against which its individual components (for example, plumes of pollution) can be distinguished.

At present, there is already extensive experience in using satellite information to study environmental anthropogenic changes and identify the causes of these changes.

unchanged: the mixture formed by gases is called air (Nitrogen - 78.09%, Oxygen - 20.95, Argon - 0.93, Carbon dioxide - 0.03, etc.) The average relative molecular weight of dry air is 28.966 kg / mol .

Emission of some gaseous substances (10 6 t/day)

Substance

Source

natural

sulphur dioxide

hydrogen sulfide

nitrogen oxides

hydrocarbons

carbon monoxide

Carbon dioxide

According to the table. natural sources emit more harmful substances, however, anthropogenic intake is the most dangerous. This is due to the fact that harmful substances of anthropogenic origin accumulate in the human habitat. In addition, specific harmful substances that did not previously exist in natural conditions are now becoming an integral part of the atmospheric air, its microelements.

Air is considered clean if none of the microcomponents is present in concentrations

industrial emissions enter the atmosphere in the form of non-directional gas flows as a result of equipment leaks, the absence or poor operation of gas extraction equipment at the places of loading, unloading or storage of the product. Fugitive emissions are typical for treatment facilities, tailings, ash dumps, loading and unloading areas, loading and unloading racks, tanks and other facilities.

The main sources of industrial air pollution include energy, metallurgy, building materials, chemical and oil refining industries, and fertilizer production.

Sanitary criteria- hygienic condition assessmentair. Substances in the air enter the human body mainly through the respiratory system. Inhaled polluted air through the trachea and bronchi enters the alveoli of the lungs, from where impurities enter the blood and lymph.

In our country, work is underway on hygienic regulation (rationing) of the permissible level of impurities in the atmospheric air. The substantiation of hygienic standards is preceded by multifaceted complex studies on laboratory animals, and in the case of assessing the body's olfactory reactions to the effects of pollutants, on volunteers. In such studies, the most modern methods developed in biology and medicine are used. At present, the maximum

a short time interval to a sharp deterioration in a person's condition.

In places where resorts are located, in the territories of sanatoriums, rest houses and in recreation areas of cities with a population of more than 200 thousand people, the concentration of impurities that pollute the atmospheric air should not exceed 0.8 MPC.

A situation may arise when there are simultaneously substances in the air that have a summed (additive) effect. In this case, the sum of their concentrations (C), normalized to MPC, should not exceed one according to the following expression: C 1 / MPC 1 + C 2 / MPC 2 + C 3 / MPC 3< = 1

Harmful substances with a summation of action include, as a rule, similar in chemical structure and nature of the effect on the human body, for example: sulfur dioxide and sulfuric acid aerosol; sulfur dioxide and hydrogen sulfide; sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide; sulfur dioxide and phenol; sulfur dioxide and hydrogen fluoride; sulfur dioxide and trioxide, ammonia, nitrogen oxides; sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, phenol and converter dust.

At the same time, many substances, when simultaneously present in atmospheric air, do not have a summation of action, i.e. maximum allowable concentrations are stored for each substance separately, for example: carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide; carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide; hydrogen sulfide and carbon disulfide.

When there are no MPC values, for evaluation

causing a change in particle dispersion. Much attention is paid to sampling in 1 hour or less, which allows you to quickly get information about the source of air pollution and identify peak particle levels. Several rapid micromethods are available for taking small air samples (200 ml) and collecting 1-2 µg of the sample. An example is the direct determination of lead macroparticles in air by flameless atomic absorption spectroscopy. The diameter of the disc filters was less than 3 mm, and the time for sampling and chemical analysis was less than 5 min per determination. For the study of sediment on the filter, rapid sampling, the industry produces a variety of equipment and filters. For any case, you can choose a filter with a precisely defined pore structure. The following methods are used to study the collected material: microscopic identification (use of visible light); microscopy in incident light, in transmitted light; electron microscopy and electron microprobe spectroscopy; chemical drop analysis; infrared spectroscopy; UV-visible spectrophotometry; flame and emission spectroscopy; X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy; x-ray diffraction analysis and radiochemistry.

Most atmospheric analysis methods

pollution is based on the use of gas chromatography, atomic absorption, polarography. The concentration of the test substances in the air (in µg/l or mg/l) is calculated by the formula C \u003d a / V, where a - mass of the substance found in the sample, μg; V - the volume of the studied air sample, reduced to normal conditions, l (0 ° C, 101080 Pa) and equal to V = 273 P V t /( 273 + t)· 101080, where R- atmospheric pressure during sampling, Pa; t- air temperature at the sampling point, °С; V t , is the volume of air sampled for analysis at a temperature t, l.

When concentrating analyzed substances from air into liquid absorption media or onto solid sorbents, fractions of the volume of sample solutions can be used in the analysis. In this case, the concentration of substances in the air is calculated by the formula C = a*V1/ V2* V, where V1 is the total volume of the sample solution, ml; V2 - the volume of the sample solution used for analysis, ml, or according to the formula C = inV1/ V, where in- concentration of the analyte in the sample solution, µg/ml.

1. Determination of inorganic compounds. The inorganic part of the air includes gases, metals and their compounds. Many standards are limited to the total metal content, and only in recent years has attention begun to be paid to the chemical nature of the compounds. This is due to the fact that the chemical nature of the substance is important in the analysis of the component and in determining the limit

with pores of a certain size. The precipitate obtained on the filter is dissolved and analyzed by any suitable method. The methods are simple, do not require expensive equipment, but at the same time they are time-consuming and do not give sufficiently accurate and reproducible results.

2. Determination of organic substances. When fuel is burned (cars, aircraft, technological processes), organic smoke is formed, containing methane, hexane, heptane, pentane, octane and acetylene. In this case, along with aliphatic compounds, aromatic compounds are also formed: benzene, xylene, chlorobenzene and cyclohexane. As a result of human activity, a significant amount of organic substances appears in the air: aerosol stimulants, pesticides, herbicides, fungicides and preservatives. Chemical methods for the analysis of organic substances depend on the type of organic compound, its concentration, and basis.

The general procedure for collecting a volatile organic compound in air involves the use of special absorbent solutions, which can be acidic, alkaline or neutral depending on the chemical properties of the analyzed product. Water, alcohol, or a solution with a reagent is often used as scavengers, giving a characteristic product with the analyte. The solutions may be in two or more bubblers connected in series.

Instrumental methods are most often used to determine organic compounds. They include,

receive a fire alarm.

Atmospheric and elevated pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) is rapidly developing for the determination of various organic contaminants. A liquid chromatograph consists of a chromatographic column, a pump and an associated detector. A suitable solvent is fed into the column, and the sample is separated into its components. High pressure pumps are used to reduce the separation time (several minutes). The development of the method is accompanied by the improvement of columns, pumps and detectors. Recently, high performance liquid chromatography has been successfully used. For example, using this method, it is possible to determine formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, propionic and butyric aldehydes in biological fluids in their joint presence.

Thin layer chromatography (TLC). Method for the semi-quantitative analysis of non-volatile organic and inorganic compounds. It is used to determine the components of particulate matter that pollute the air. In TLC, a glass plate supports the adsorbent layer and a spot of the analyzed mixture is applied near one edge of the plate. The edge located below the spot is immersed in the selected solvent, which moves due to capillary forces in the adsorbent layer. With a good selection of the mixture-solvent-adsorbent system, contaminants move through the layer and are separated. After

Soil Quality Control Methods

The thin soil cover of the earth is a biological absorber capable of destroying harmful substances that enter it from the atmosphere and from industrial enterprises. Phenols, dioxides, heavy metals, organic and inorganic compounds represent a great environmental hazard. You can examine the soil for the presence of toxic substances using special equipment, including Expert 003, B 1200 and other photometers. The level of radioactive contamination of the soil is determined by laboratory gamma spectrometric analysis using SRP-88 or Bella devices. Research helps to check the soil for the presence of pathogenic microflora, as well as pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, etc.

Fertility Options

Soil productivity indicators determined by simple methods are also important. You can find out about the ability of the soil to absorb and retain moisture, without which plants are doomed to death, by collecting it in a room. If it crumbles when it falls, then the moisture capacity is 30-50%, does not roll - no more than 25%, retains its shape - 75-90%. Humus, beneficial microorganisms and nutrients are responsible for the biological activity of the earth. You can determine its level by burying filtered paper in different areas. The more the leaf decays in a month, the richer the soil. The mechanical composition of the soil is determined by the rolling of a wet ball with a diameter of 4 cm. The figure did not work out? The ground is dominated by sand. If you managed to build:

  • cord - sandy loamy soil;
  • unbreakable ring - light loam;
  • bagel with cracks - heavy loam.

The acidity of the soil is determined by means of special litmus paper, as well as by the prevailing plants. Horsetail and sorrel indicate that the earth is very acidic, clover inhabits soil with moderate indicators, and field mustard and white sandman choose alkaline soils. With the help of a sieve with cells from 0.5 to 1 mm, the degree of coarseness of the soil fractions is revealed. In this case, the sample should be taken at a depth of 10-15 cm. The best porosity has a soil with 80% of particles from 0.5 to 1 mm, 5% - more than 1 mm and 15% - less than 0.5 mm. In conclusion, it is necessary to say about the ripeness of the earth, that is, about its readiness for processing. As a rule, good soil does not dust, crumble or stick to the shovel.

In the USSR, only one standard was established that determines the permissible level of soil pollution with harmful chemicals - MPC for the arable soil layer. The principle of rationing the content of chemical compounds in the soil is based on the fact that their entry into the body occurs mainly through the media in contact with the soil. The basic concepts relating to the chemical contamination of soils are defined by GOST 17.4.1.03-84. Protection of Nature. Soils. Terms and definitions of chemical pollution.

The principle of soil pollution control is to check the compliance of pollutant concentrations with established norms and requirements in the form of MPC and APC (approximately permissible amount).

The concept of MPC for soil is somewhat different from that for other environments. MPC of pollutants in soil - the maximum mass fraction of a soil pollutant that does not cause direct or indirect effects, including individual effects on the environment and human health. For example, MPC for pesticides in soil is the maximum content of pesticide residues at which they migrate to adjacent environments in amounts that do not exceed hygienic standards, and also do not adversely affect the biological activity of the soil itself.

In addition to MPC, in the normalization of impacts, a temporary standard is used - OPC - the maximum approximate allowable amount, which is obtained by calculation. The DCS is reviewed every three years or replaced by MPCs.

MPCs and AECs for soil chemicals have been developed and approved in the Russian Federation for approximately 200 substances. They serve as a criterion for classifying soils according to the impact of chemical pollutants on them, as well as for ranking pollutants into hazard classes for soils.

Soil pollution, as well as other natural environments, is combined (multiple), and therefore, in the chemical control of pollution, it becomes necessary to identify priority pollutants that are subject to control in the first place. When determining priority pollutants, their hazard classes are taken into account.

MPCs are developed mainly on the basis of the principles, techniques and methods of toxicology: they establish such concentrations in media in contact with the soil (plants, water, air) that do not pose a danger to human health and do not adversely affect the general sanitary indicators of the soil. In this case, the following indicators of harmfulness are used.

General sanitary indicator of harmfulness for soil. characterizes the effect of a substance on the self-cleaning ability of the soil and soil microbiocenosis in quantities that do not change these processes.

Translocation indicator of harmfulness. It characterizes the ability of substances to pass from the arable layer of soil through the root system of plants and accumulate in its green mass and fruits in an amount not exceeding the MPC for this substance in food products.

Migratory air indicator of harmfulness. It characterizes the ability of a substance to pass from the arable soil layer into the atmospheric air and surface water sources in an amount that does not exceed the MPC value for atmospheric air during migration.

The soil pollution regulation system, in comparison with other systems, is not considered to be sufficiently successful. For many chemicals MPCs have not been developed due to the fact that their fate is very difficult. Basically, the assessment is made by comparison with background concentrations.

It should be noted that MPC standards for pesticides in the Russian Federation (and in the former USSR) are in most cases more stringent than in other countries.

Monitoring and control of sweat pollution is carried out in the Russian Federation by the GOS of Roshydromet and other departments. Types of observations are established taking into account the nature of pollution in the region and the priority of pollutants.

health indicators. For all types of lands of the unified state land fund, control of the sanitary condition of soils is carried out. Under the sanitary condition is understood the totality of the physicochemical and biological properties of the soil, which determine its safety in epidemiological and hygienic terms.

The purpose of control is to prevent soil pollution by household and industrial emissions and waste, as well as substances purposefully used in agriculture and forestry.

The list of controlled indicators includes sanitary-bacteriological, sanitary-helminthological and sanitary-entomological indicators. These are the sanitary number (the ratio of protein nitrogen to total organic nitrogen), concentrations of ammonium and nitrate nitrogen, chlorides, pesticide residues and other pollutants (heavy metals, oil and oil products, phenols, sulfur compounds), carcinogens, radioactive substances, macro - and microfertilizers, thermophilic bacteria, bacteria of the Escherichia coli group, pathogenic microorganisms, eggs and larvae of helminths and flies. 2 The presence of organisms that characterize sanitary and bacteriological indicators indicates specific organic, fecal and other types of pollution.

List of indicators for different types of land use: settlements, resorts and recreation areas, zones of water supply sources, territories of enterprises, farmland and forests - is different.

Indicators of the sanitary state of soils are used not only for their intended purpose, but also to assess the suitability of a disturbed fertile soil layer for earthing.

biological indicators. The degree of soil contamination depends both on the anthropogenic load and on other factors: the ability of soils to self-purify, decompose, and transform pollutants during mineralization and humification.

Various groups of organisms are involved in the destruction of chemicals in the soil, including bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes, and plants. The latter absorb and process pollutants in the course of their metabolism. The ability to self-cleanse is determined primarily by the activity of soil microflora and other soil organisms, physical and chemical conditions and soil properties.

Anthropogenic impacts: fertilization, pesticide treatment, land reclamation and desiccation, as well as environmental factors (temperature, precipitation, topography of the territory) affect the activity of soil, microflora and fauna.

In ecological studies of soils, various biological indicators are used:

"respiration", indicators of cellulose-decomposing activity, activity of enzymes (urease, dehydrogenase, phosphatase), the number of fungi, yeast, etc. Usually several indicators are used, since their "sensitivity" to various pollutants differs significantly.

In assessing the ecological state of soils in works to identify zones of ecological trouble, the main indicators are Criteria for physical degradation, chemical and biological contamination. A sign of biological degradation (as a result of toxic effects) is a decrease in the level of active microbial mass; less accurate is soil respiration.

As a complex indicator of toxic soil pollution, it is recommended to use the phytotoxicity indicator. Phytotoxicity- biotest integral indicator, which is understood as a property of soil previously contaminated (for example, with herbicides) to suppress seed germination, growth and development of higher plants. The phytotoxicity indicator has been used along with traditional indicators in the development of MPCs for herbicides (a group of pesticides that are used in agriculture to control weeds) since 1982. When biotesting, the decrease in the number of seedlings compared to the control is considered an indicator of the presence of soil phytotoxicity.

The maximum permissible concentration in the arable soil layer (MPC n) is the concentration of a harmful substance in the upper, arable soil layer, which should not have a direct or indirect negative effect on the environment in contact with the soil and on human health, as well as on the self-cleaning ability of the soil.

MPC standards are designed for substances that can migrate into the atmospheric air or groundwater, reduce yields or deteriorate the quality of agricultural products.

Currently, the Institute of Human Ecology is conducting research aimed at substantiating individual MPC standards for various types of soils. Thus, in the near future it should be expected that the features of the migration and transformation of harmful substances in soils will be reflected in the rationing system.

The assessment of the level of chemical pollution of soils in settlements is carried out according to the indicators developed during the associated geochemical and hygienic studies of the environment of cities. Such indicators are the concentration coefficient of the chemical element K c and the total pollution index Z c .

The concentration coefficient is defined as the ratio of the actual content of the element in the soil C to the background Cf: K s \u003d C / C f.

Since soils are often contaminated with several elements at once, the total pollution index is calculated for them, reflecting the effect of the impact of a group of elements:

where K si- concentration factor i-th element in the sample; n- number of considered elements.

The total pollution index can be determined both for all elements in one sample, and for a site of the territory based on a geochemical sample.

Assessment of the danger of soil pollution by a complex of elements according to the indicator Zc is carried out according to an assessment scale, the gradations of which are developed on the basis of a study of the state of health of the population living in territories with different levels of soil pollution.

Table. Indicative rating scale for the danger of soil pollution

by total

Soil pollution categories Z value with Changes in health indicators of the population in the sources of pollution
Permissible less than 16 The lowest level of morbidity in children and the minimum of functional deviations
Moderately dangerous 16-32 Increasing overall incidence
dangerous 32-128 An increase in the overall level of morbidity, the number of frequently ill children, children with chronic diseases, impaired functioning of the cardiovascular system
extremely dangerous over 128 An increase in the incidence of the child population, a violation of the reproductive function of women (an increase in cases of toxicosis during pregnancy, premature birth, stillbirth, hypotrophy of newborns).

Maximum Permissible Concentrations of Some Chemical Substances in Soil

The name of a substance or complex mixtures of constant composition MPCp, mg/kg air-dry weight Limiting indicator
Acetaldehyde 10,0 Migratory air
Benzene 0,3 Migratory air
Benz(a)pyrene 0,02 Migratory air
Isopropylbenzene 0,5 Air migration
Karbofos 2,0 Transition to plants
Keltan 1,0 Same
Manganese general sanitary
Copper 3,0 general sanitary
Arsenic 2,0 Transition to plants
Nickel 4,0 general sanitary
Nitrates 130,0 migratory water
Mercury 2,1 Transition to plants
Lead 20,0 general sanitary
Antimony 4,5 migratory water
Superphosphate Same
Toluene 0,3 Migratory air and translocation
Formaldehyde 7,0 general sanitary
Phosphorus (P 2 O 5) Transition to plants
Phtalofos 0,1 Same
Chloramp 0,05 Same
Chlorophos 0,5 Same
Chrome Hexavalent 0,05 Same
Zinc 23,0 Translocation

State system of sanitary and epidemiological regulation of the Russian Federation

Federal Sanitary Rules, Norms and Hygiene Standards


HOUSEHOLD AND INDUSTRIAL WASTE,
SOIL SANITARY PROTECTION

Guidelines

MU 2.1.7.730-99

Russian Ministry of Health

Moscow-1999

1. Guidelines developed by: Research Institute of Human Ecology and Environmental Hygiene. A. N. Systin of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences (N. V. Rusakov, N. I. Tonkopiy, N. L. Velikanov), E. I. Martsinovsky Institute of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (N. A. Romanenko, G. I. Novosiltsev, L. A. Ganushkina, V. P. Dremova, E. P. Khromenkova, L. V. Grimailo, T. G. Kozyreva, V. I. Evdokimova, O. A. Zemlyansky, V. V. Evdokimov, A. N. Volischev, V. V. Gorokhov), RADON LLC (V. D. Simonov), All-Russian Research Institute of Nature (Yu. M. Matveev).

2. Approved and put into effect by the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation on February 5, 1999.

3. Introduced for the first time

4. With the release of these guidelines, they lose their force in terms of conducting a hygienic assessment of the degree of biological and chemical contamination of soils "Guidelines for the sanitary and microbiological study of soil" dated 04.08.76 No. 1446-76 and "Guidelines for assessing the degree of danger of soil contamination with chemicals ” dated 13.03.87 No. 4266-87, as well as “Estimated indicators of the sanitary condition of the soil in populated areas” dated July 7, 1977 No. 1739-77.

"APPROVE"

Chief State Sanitary Doctor

Russian Federation

G. G. Onishchenko

MU 2.1.7.730-99

Date of introduction: 04/05/99

2.1.7. SOIL, CLEANING OF POPULATED PLACES,
HOUSEHOLD AND INDUSTRIAL WASTE,
SOIL SANITARY PROTECTION

Hygienic assessment of soil quality in populated areas

Hygienic evaluation of soil in residential areas

Guidelines

1 area of ​​use

This document is a regulatory and methodological basis for the implementation of state sanitary and epidemiological supervision of the sanitary condition of soils in populated areas, agricultural land, territories of resort areas and individual institutions. The document is intended for institutions of the State Sanitary and Epidemiological Service of the Russian Federation and special services of federal executive bodies that exercise supervision.

The danger of soil pollution is determined by the level of its possible negative impact on contacting media (water, air), food products and directly or indirectly on humans, as well as on the biological activity of the soil and self-purification processes.

The results of soil surveys are taken into account when determining and predicting the degree of their danger to health and living conditions of the population in settlements, developing measures for their reclamation, preventing infectious and non-infectious morbidity, regional planning schemes, technical solutions for the rehabilitation and protection of watershed areas, when deciding the order of sanitation activities within the framework of integrated environmental programs and assessment of the effectiveness of rehabilitation and sanitary-ecological measures and current sanitary control over objects that directly or indirectly affect the environment of the settlement.

The use of unified methodological approaches will contribute to obtaining comparable data in assessing the levels of soil pollution.

The assessment of the danger of contaminated soil in settlements is determined by: 1) epidemic significance; 2) its role as a source of secondary pollution of the surface layer of atmospheric air and in direct contact with a person.

The sanitary characteristics of soils in populated areas are based on laboratory sanitary-chemical, sanitary-bacteriological, sanitary-helminthological, sanitary-entomological indicators.

2. Regulatory references

1. Law of the Russian Federation "Fundamentals of the legislation of the Russian Federation on the protection of the health of citizens."

3. Terms and definitions

The sanitary condition of the soil - a set of physicochemical and biological properties of the soil that determine the quality and degree of its safety in epidemic and hygienic terms.

Chemical contamination of the soil - a change in the chemical composition of the soil that has arisen under the direct or indirect influence of a land use factor (industrial, agricultural, municipal), causing a decrease in its quality and a possible danger to public health.

Soil biological pollution - an integral part of organic pollution caused by the dissemination of pathogens of infectious and parasitic diseases, as well as harmful insects and ticks, carriers of pathogens of humans, animals and plants.

Indicators of the sanitary condition of soils - a complex of sanitary-chemical, microbiological, helminthological, entomological characteristics of the soil.

Soil buffer capacity - the ability of a soil to maintain its chemical state at a constant level when the soil is exposed to a chemical flux.

The priority component of soil pollution is the substance or biological agent that is primarily subject to control.

background content (pollution) - the content of chemicals in the soils of territories that are not subject to technogenic impact or experience it to a minimum extent.

Maximum Permissible Concentration (MAC) The chemical content in the soil is a complex indicator of the content of chemicals in the soil that is harmless to humans, since the criteria used in its justification reflect the possible ways of the impact of pollution on the contacting media, the biological activity of the soil and the processes of its self-purification. Substantiation of MPC chemicals in the soil based on 4 main indicators of harmfulness, established experimentally: translocation characterizing the transition of a substance from the soil to the plant, migratory water characterizes the ability of a substance to pass from the soil to groundwater and water sources, migratory air hazard index characterizes the transition of a substance from the soil into the atmospheric air, and general sanitary indicator of harmfulness characterizes the effect of a pollutant on the self-cleaning capacity of the soil and its biological activity. At the same time, each of the ways of exposure is quantified with the justification of the permissible level of the content of the substance for each indicator of harmfulness. The lowest reasonable content level is limiting and is taken for MPC.

4. Notation and abbreviations

MPC- maximum allowable concentration of the pollutant.

JEC - approximate allowable concentration of the substance.

5. General provisions

5.1. The soil survey program is determined by the goals and objectives of the study, taking into account the sanitary and epidemic state of the area, the level and nature of loading technologies, and land use conditions.

5.2. When choosing objects, first of all, soils of territories with an increased risk of impact on public health are examined (children's preschool, school and medical institutions, residential areas, zones of sanitary protection of reservoirs, drinking water supply, land occupied by agricultural crops, recreational zones, etc.)

Control over soil pollution in settlements is carried out taking into account the functional zones of the city. Sampling sites are preliminarily marked on a map showing the structure of the urban landscape. The test site should be located in a typical location for the study area. In case of heterogeneity of the relief, the sites are selected according to the elements of the relief. For the territory to be controlled, a description is made indicating the address, sampling point, general relief of the microdistrict, location of sampling sites and sources of pollution, vegetation cover, soil type and other data necessary for the correct assessment and interpretation of the results of sample analyzes.

5.3.1. When monitoring soil pollution by industrial sources, sampling sites are located on an area of ​​three times the size of the sanitary protection zone along the wind rose vectors at a distance of 100, 200, 300, 500, 1000, 2000, 5000 m or more from the pollution source (GOST 17.4. 4.02-84).

5.3.2. To control the sanitary condition of soils in preschool, school and medical institutions, playgrounds and recreation areas, sampling is carried out at least 2 times a year - in spring and autumn. The size of the trial area should be no more than 5´ 5 m. When monitoring the sanitary condition of soils in the territories of children's institutions and playgrounds, sampling is carried out separately from sandboxes and the general territory from a depth of 0-10 cm.

5.3.3. From each sandbox, one combined sample is taken, made up of 5 point samples. If necessary, it is possible to select one combined sample from all sandboxes of each age group, composed of 8-10 point samples.

Soil samples are taken either from the playing territories of each group (one combined of at least five point samples), or one combined sample from a total area of ​​10 point ones, while taking into account the most likely places of soil contamination.

5.3.4. When monitoring soils in the area of ​​point sources of pollution (cesspools, garbage bins, etc.), test sites no larger than 5´ 5 m are laid at different distances from the source and in a relatively clean place (control).

5.3.5. When studying soil pollution by transport highways, test sites are laid on roadside strips, taking into account the terrain, vegetation cover, meteorological and hydrological conditions. Soil samples are taken from narrow strips 200-500 m long at a distance of 0-10.10-50.50-100 m from the roadway. One mixed sample is made up of 20-25 point samples taken from a depth of 0-10 cm.

5.3.6. When assessing the soils of agricultural areas, samples are taken 2 times a year (spring, autumn) from a depth of 0-25 cm. For every 0-15 ha, at least one site of 100-200 m ).

5.3.7. Geochemical mapping of the territory of large cities with numerous sources of pollution is carried out using the testing network ( ,). To identify sources of pollution, geochemists recommend a sampling density of 1–5 samples/km 2 with a distance between sampling points of 400–1000 m. 200 m. Samples are recommended to be taken from a depth of 0-5 cm. The size of the testing network may vary depending on the scale of mapping, the nature of the use of the territory, the requirements for the level of pollution (), as well as the spatial variability of the pollution content in certain areas of the surveyed territories.

Mapping is carried out by specialized organizations.

5.3.8. Spot samples are taken in accordance with GOST (GOST), in compliance with sterility for sanitary-microbiological and helminthological analyzes and top-filled containers with ground-in lids when determining contamination with volatile substances, on a test site using the envelope method. The combined sample is made up of points equal in volume (at least 5) taken on the same site. The pooled samples must be packed in clean plastic bags, closed, labeled, recorded in the sampling log and numbered. An accompanying coupon is drawn up for each sample, together with which the sample is inserted into the second outer bag, which ensures the integrity and safety of their transportation. The time from sampling to the start of their research should not exceed 1 day.

Preparation of samples for analysis is carried out in accordance with the type of analysis (). In the laboratory, the sample is freed from impurities, brought to an air-dry state, thoroughly mixed and divided into parts for analysis. Separately, the control portion from each analyzed sample (about 200 g) is left and stored in the refrigerator for 2 weeks in case of arbitration.

5.4. The list of indicators of chemical and biological soil pollution is determined based on:

· goals and objectives of the study;

The nature of land use ();

· specifics of pollution sources that determine the nature (composition and level) of pollution of the study area ( ,);

· priority of pollution components in accordance with the list of MPC and AEC of chemicals in the soil and their hazard class in accordance with GOST 17.4.1.02-83. "Protection of Nature. The soil. Classification of chemicals for pollution control "().

5.5. The determination of the concentrations of chemicals in the soil is carried out by the methods used to substantiate the MPC (MAC) or by methods that are metrologically certified ( , , , ).


Table 1

Methodological principles of soil selection of the sanitary state of soils

The nature of the analysis

Sampling frequency

Placement of trial sites

Required number of trial sites

Trial pad size

Number of pooled samples from one site

Sampling depth, cm

Mass of the pooled sample

sanitary-chemical

at least 1 time/year

at different distances from the source of pollution

at least one at each control point

one of at least 5 points of 200 g each

in layers
0-5

including for heavy metals

at least 1 time in 3 years

bacteriological

at least 1 time/year

in places of possible location of people, animals, pollution with organic waste

10 of 3 points, 200-250 g each

in layers
0-5

helminthological

2-3 times/year

the same as for bacteriology

on an area of ​​100 m 2 one platform

4-10 each of 10 point 20 g each

in layers
0-5

entomological

at least 2 times/year

waste bins of various types, landfills, silt, sites

around one object 10 sites

0,2´ 2 m

1 out of 10 venues

Assessment of biological activity of soils (dynamics of self-purification)

within 3 months. (vegetation period) 1st month. weekly, then 1 time/month

at least 1 experimental and 1 control site

1 pooled of at least 5 pinpoints of 200 g


6.6. With multi-element pollution, the assessment of the degree of danger of soil pollution is allowed for the most toxic element with the maximum content in the soil.

Table 3

Critical assessment of the degree of soil contamination with organic matter

6.7. The assessment of the level of chemical contamination of soils as an indicator of an adverse impact on the health of the population is carried out according to indicators developed in the course of associated geochemical and geohygienic studies of the environment of cities with active sources of pollution. These indicators are: chemical concentration factor (K s). K s determined by the ratio of the actual content of the analyte in the soil (С i ) in mg/kg of soil to the regional background (С f i ):

K c \u003d C i C f i ;

and total pollution index ( Zc) The total pollution index is equal to the sum of the concentration coefficients of chemical pollutant elements and is expressed by the formula:

Z c = S(K with i +...+K cn) - (n -1), where

n - number of determined summable substances;

K with i - concentration factor i -th pollution component.

An analysis of the distribution of geochemical parameters obtained as a result of testing soils on a regular network gives a spatial structure of pollution of residential areas and the air basin, and makes it possible to identify risk zones for public health ( ,).

6.8. Assessment of the degree of danger of soil pollution by a complex of metals in terms of Zc , reflecting the differentiation of urban air pollution both with metals and other most common ingredients (dust, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide, sulfur dioxide), is carried out according to the rating scale shown in Table 4.

Determination of chemicals in assessing the level of soil pollution in settlements according to Zc carried out by the method of emission analysis in accordance with the guidelines ( ,).

6.9. Assessment of the adverse effects of soil pollution during their direct impact on the human body is important for cases of geophagia in children when playing on contaminated soils. Such an assessment is carried out for the most common pollutant in settlements - lead, the increased content of which in the soils of the city, as a rule, is accompanied by an increase in the content of other elements. With the systematic presence of lead in the soil of playgrounds within 300 mg / kg, a change in the psychoneurological status in children can be expected (). Lead pollution at the MPC level in soil is considered safe.

6.10. The assessment of soils for agricultural use is carried out in accordance with the concept given in.

6.11. In order to make administrative decisions on the nature of the use of lands contaminated with chemicals to varying degrees, it is recommended to be guided by the RD "Procedure for determining damage from land pollution with chemicals" (), taking into account the nature of land use.

Z value c

Changes in health indicators of the population in the sources of pollution

Permissible

The lowest level of morbidity in children and the minimum incidence of functional abnormalities

Moderately dangerous

Increase in overall morbidity

An increase in general morbidity, the number of frequently ill children, children with chronic diseases, disorders of the functional cardiovascular system

extremely dangerous

An increase in the incidence of the child population, a violation of the reproductive function of women (an increase in toxicosis of pregnancy, the number of premature births, stillbirths, hypotrophy of newborns)

7. Assessment of the sanitary condition of the soil according to sanitary and chemical indicators

7.1. Sanitary-chemical indicators of the sanitary condition of soils are:

Sanitary number C - indirectly characterizes the process of soil humification and allows you to evaluate the self-cleaning ability of the soil from organic pollution.

The sanitary number C is the ratio of the amount of "soil protein (humus) nitrogen" A "in milligrams per 100 g of absolutely dry soil to the amount of" organic nitrogen "B" in milligrams per 100 g of absolutely dry soil. Thus, the quotient of division: C \u003d A / B. The assessment of the sanitary condition of the soil according to this indicator is carried out in accordance with.

Assessment of soil purity according to the "Sanitary number" (according to N. I. Khlebnikov) ()

7.2. Chemical indicators of the processes of decomposition of nitrogen-containing organic matter in the soil are ammonia and nitrate nitrogen. Ammonium nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen and chlorides characterize the level of soil pollution with organic matter. It is advisable to evaluate soils according to these indicators in dynamics or by comparison with uncontaminated soil (control).

8 Assessment of the degree of biological contamination of soils

8.1. Sanitary and bacteriological indicators

8.1.1. In contaminated soil, against the background of a decrease in true representatives of soil microbiocenoses (antagonists of pathogenic intestinal microflora) and a decrease in its biological activity, there is an increase in positive findings of pathogenic enterobacteria and geohelminths, which are more resistant to chemical soil pollution than representatives of natural soil microbiocenoses. This is one of the reasons for the need to take into account the epidemiological safety of soil in settlements. With an increase in the chemical load, the epidemic danger of the soil may increase.

8.1.2. Grade soil health carried out based on the results of soil analyzes at high-risk facilities (kindergartens, playgrounds, sanitary protection zones, etc.) and in sanitary protection zones according to sanitary and bacteriological indicators:

1) Indirect, characterize the intensity of the biological load on the soil. These are sanitary-indicative organisms of the Escherichia coli group. (BGKP (Koliindex) and fecal streptococci (Enterococcus index)). In large cities with a high population density, the biological load on the soil is very high, and as a result, the indices of sanitary-indicative organisms are high, which, along with sanitary-chemical indicators (ammonia and nitrate dynamics, sanitary number), indicates this high load.

2) Direct sanitary and bacteriological indicators of the epidemic danger of the soil - detection of causative agents of intestinal infections (causative agents of intestinal infections, pathogenic enterobacteria, enteroviruses).

8.1.3. The results of the analyzes are evaluated in accordance with.

8.1.4. In the absence of the possibility of direct determination of enterobacteria and enteroviruses in soils, a safety assessment can be carried out approximately on indicator microorganisms.

8.1.5. The soil is assessed as "clean" without restrictions on sanitary and bacteriological indicators in the absence of pathogenic bacteria and the index of sanitary indicative microorganisms is up to 10 cells per gram of soil.

The possibility of soil contamination with Salmonella is evidenced by the index of sanitary indicative organisms (CGB and enterococci) of 10 or more cells/g of soil.

The concentration of coliphage in the soil at a level of 10 PFU per g or more indicates the information of the soil by enteviruses.

8.1.6. Sanitary and bacteriological studies are carried out in accordance with the regulatory and methodological literature given above in (,,).


Eggs of geohelminths remain viable in the soil from 3 to 10 years, biohelminths - up to 1 year, cysts of intestinal pathogenic protozoa - from several days to 3-6 months.

8.2.3. A direct threat to the health of the population is the contamination of soil viability with fertilized and invasive eggs of ascarids, whipworms, tkosokar, ankylostomids, strongyloid larvae, as well as teniid oncospheres, cysts of lamlia, isospores, balantidia, amoebas, cryptosporidium oocysts; mediated - viable eggs of opisthorchis, diphylobotriid.

type of pathogens

their viability and invasiveness;

8.3.1. Sanitary and entomological indicators are larvae and pupae of synanthropic flies.

Synanthropic flies (house, house, meat, etc.) are of great epidemiological importance as mechanical carriers of pathogens of a number of infectious and parasitic human diseases (cysts of intestinal pathogenic protozoa, helminth eggs, etc.).

8.3.2. On the territory of populated areas in public and private households, food and trade enterprises, private and public catering points, in a zoo, places for keeping service and sports animals (horses, dogs), meat and dairy plants, etc. The most probable breeding grounds for flies are accumulations of decomposing organic matter (garbage bins of various types, latrines, landfills, silt pits, etc.) and the soil around them at a distance of up to 1 m.

8.3.3. The criterion for assessing the sanitary and entomological state of the soil is the absence or presence of preimaginal (larvae and pupae) forms of synanthropic flies in it on an area measuring 20 x 20 cm.

8.3.4. The assessment of the sanitary condition of soils by the presence of fly larvae and pupae in it is carried out in accordance with.

The presence of larvae and pupae in the soil of populated areas is an indicator of dissatisfaction with the sanitary condition of the soil and indicates poor cleaning of the territory, improper collection and storage of household waste in sanitary and hygienic terms, and their untimely disposal.

8.3.5. Sanitary and entomological studies are carried out in accordance with the guidelines ().

9. Indicators of soil biological activity

9.1. Studies on the biological activity of the soil are carried out if necessary, an in-depth assessment of its sanitary condition and the ability to self-purify.

9.2. The main integral indicators of the biological activity of the soil are: total microbial abundance (TMC), the abundance of the main groups of soil microorganisms (soil saprophytic bacteria, actinomycetes, soil micromycetes), indicators of the intensity of transformation of carbon and nitrogen compounds in the soil ("respiration" of the soil, "sanitary number" , the dynamics of ammonia nitrogen and nitrates in the soil, nitrogen fixation, ammonification, nitrification and denitrification), the dynamics of acidity and redox potential in the soil, the activity of enzymatic systems and other indicators.

9.3. The list of indicators is determined by the objectives of the study, the nature and intensity of pollution, and the nature of land use.

At the first stage of research, it is advisable to use the most simple and quickly determined informative integral indicators: soil “breathing”, total microbial abundance, redox potential and acidity of soils, dynamics of ammonia nitrogen and nitrates.

Further in-depth study is carried out in accordance with the results obtained and the general objectives of the study.

9.4. Methods for measuring and evaluating the biological activity of the soil are given in the "Methodological guidelines for the hygienic justification of the maximum concentration limit of chemicals in the soil" dated 05.08.82 No. 2609 82. So, the soil can be considered "uncontaminated" in terms of biological activity with changes in microbiological indicators of no more than 50% and biochemical no more than 25% compared with the same for the control, taken as clean uncontaminated soils.

10 Conclusion on the sanitary condition of soils

The conclusion on the sanitary condition of the surveyed area is given on the basis of the results of the comprehensive studies ( , , , , ) taking into account:

sanitary and epidemiological situation in the survey area;

· requirements for the levels of soil pollution depending on their economic use;

· general patterns given in that determine the behavior of chemical elements and pollutant compounds in the soil.

Appendix 1

Classification of plots of the surveyed area according to economic use and requirements for the level of soil pollution ()

Usage

Requirements

Mapping

Household farms, gardens, coastal areas, children's and medical institutions

1: 200-1: 10000

Farmland, recreation areas

elevated

1: 10000-1: 50000

Forests, waste land, large industrial facilities, urban areas of industrial development

Moderate

1: 50000-1: 100000


Oil and oil products, mg/kg

Volatile phenols, mg/kg

Arsenic, mg/kg

Polychlorinated biphenyls, µg/kg

Lactose-positive Escherichia coli (Koli form), index

Enterococci (fecal streptococci), index

Pathogenic microorganisms (according to epidemiological indications), index

Eggs and larvae of helminths (viable), ind./kg

Cysts of intestinal pathogenic protozoa, ind./100 g

Larvae and pupae of synanthropic flies, ind./in the soil area 20 ´ 20 cm

Notes: * the choice of a specific indicator depends on the nature of the means of chemicalization of agriculture used ; ); *** allowed to determine fecal forms

The sign “+” means that it is mandatory to determine the indicator when determining the sanitary condition of soils, the sign “-” is an optional indicator, the sign “ ± » - indicator is obligatory in the presence of a source of pollution.

Annex 3

List of pollution sources and chemical elements,
accumulation of which is possible in the soil in the zones of influence of these sources

Type of industry

Production facilities

Chemical elements

priority

Related

Non-ferrous metallurgy

Production of non-ferrous metals directly from ores and concentrates

Lead, zinc, copper, silver

Tin, bismuth, arsenic, cadmium, antimony, mercury, selenium

Secondary processing of non-ferrous metals

Lead, zinc, tin, copper

Production of hard and refractory metals

Tungsten

Molybdenum

Titanium production

Silver, zinc, lead, boron, copper

Titanium, manganese, molybdenum, tin, vanadium

Ferrous metallurgy

Alloy steel production

Cobalt, molybdenum, bismuth, tungsten, zinc

Lead, cadmium, chromium, zinc

iron ore production

Lead, silver, arsenic, thallium

Zinc, tungsten, cobalt, vanadium

Mechanical engineering and metalworking industry

Enterprises with heat treatment of metals (excluding foundries)

Lead, zinc

Nickel, chrome, mercury, tin, copper

Production of accumulators, production of devices for the electrical and electronic industry

Lead, nickel, cadmium

Antimony, lead, zinc, bismuth

Chemical industry

Production of superphosphate fertilizers

Strontium, zinc, fluorine, barium

Rare earths, copper, chromium, arsenic, yttrium

Plastics production

Sulfur compounds

Copper, zinc, silver

Building materials industry

Cement production (when using waste from metallurgical production, the accumulation of relevant elements is possible)

Mercury, zinc, strontium

Printing industry

Type foundries and printing houses

Lead, zinc, tin

Municipal solid waste from large cities used as fertilizer

Lead, cadmium, tin, copper, silver, antimony, zinc

Sewage sludge

Lead, cadmium, vanadium, nickel, tin, chromium, copper, zinc

Mercury, silver

Polluted irrigation water

Lead, zinc


Source of pollution

Ferrous and non-ferrous metallurgy

Instrumentation

mechanical engineering

Chemical industry

Motor transport

Molybdenum

Note."O" - mandatory control, " W» - optional control.

Industry: A - alloy steel plant; B - non-ferrous metal plant; C- alloy plant;D- processing of secondary color; E - battery production; F- radiator production; G- electrical production; H - precision engineering; I- production of household products; J- heavy engineering; K - light engineering; L- production of plastics; M- production of paints; N- road network of filling stations. Appendix 6

Schematic diagram of the assessment of agricultural use soils contaminated with chemicals ()

Pollution characteristic

Possible uses

Suggested Activities

1. Acceptable

Use without restrictions for any crops

Reducing the level of exposure to pollution sources. Implementation of measures to reduce the availability of toxicants for plants (liming, application of organic fertilizers, etc.)

2. Moderately dangerous

Use for any crops subject to quality control of agricultural products

Measures similar to category 1. If there are substances with a limiting water or air migration indicator, the content of these substances in the breathing zone of agricultural workers and in the water of local water sources is monitored

3. Highly dangerous

Use for industrial crops. Use under agricultural crops is limited due to concentrator plants

1. In addition to the activities specified for category 1, mandatory control over the content of toxicants in plants - food and feed

2. If it is necessary to grow plants - food - it is recommended to mix them with food grown on clean soil

3. Limitation of the use of green mass for livestock feed, taking into account plants - concentrators

4. Extremely dangerous

Use for industrial crops or exclude from agricultural use. windbreaks

Measures to reduce the level of pollution and the binding of toxicants in the soil. Control over the content of toxicants in the breathing zone of agricultural workers and water of local water sources

Appendix 7

Maximum Permissible Concentrations (MACs) of Inorganic Chemical Substances in Soil and Permissible Levels of Their Content in Terms of Harm

Substance name

MPC in-va mg / kg of soil, taking into account the background

Levels of harmful indicators (K1 - K4) and the maximum of them - (K max) in mg / kg

Hazard Class

Translocation (K1)

migratory

general sanitary

Air (K3)

Mobile forms extracted from soil with ammonium acetate buffer pH 4.8

Mobile forms extracted from soil with ammonium acetate buffer pH 4.8

Mobile forms extracted from soil with ammonium acetate buffer pH 4.8

Manganese chernozem

Mobile forms extracted from soil with ammonium acetate buffer pH 4.8

Manganese soddy-podzolic soil with pH 1.4-5.6

Manganese soddy-podzolic soil with pH > 6

Chernozem manganese

Extractable 0.1 and H 2 SO 4

Manganese soddy-podzolic soil pH 4

pH > 6

Ammonium-sodium buffer pH 3.5 for gray soils and 4.7 soddy-podzolic soil

> 1000

water soluble

Manganese

manganese + vanadium

Lead + mercury

Potassium chloride (K 2 O)

Sulfur compounds (S): Elemental sulfur

Hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S)

Sulfuric acid

Coal flotation waste (CFP)1

Complex granular fertilizers (KGU) 2 NPK(64:0:15)

Liquid complex fertilizers (LCF) 3 NPK (10:4:0)

> 800

> 8000

Benz(a)pyrene

Notes.MPCs should be adjusted in accordance with the newly developed documents.

1) MPC OFU are controlled by the content of benzo (a) pyrene in the soil, which should not exceed the MPC of benzo (a) pyrene.

2) MPC KSU composition NPK(64:0:15) are controlled by the content of nitrates in the soil, which should not exceed 76.8 mg/kg abs. dry soil.

3) MPC HCS composition NPK(10:4:0) TU 6-08-290-74 with the addition of manganese not more than 0.6% of the total mass is controlled by the content of mobile phosphates in the soil, which should not exceed 27.2 mg/kg abs. dry soil. 5 . GOST 17.4.4.02 -84 “Nature protection. The soil. Methods for the selection and preparation of soil samples for chemical, bacteriological and helminthological analysis.

6 . GOST 17.4.3.06-86 (ST SEV 5101-85) “Nature protection. Soils. General requirements for the classification of soils according to the influence of chemical pollutants on them.

7. Guidelines for assessing the degree of danger of soil pollution by chemicals No. 4266-87. Approved Ministry of Health of the USSR 13.03.87.

8. Estimated indicators of the sanitary condition of soils in populated areas No. 1739-77 Approved. Ministry of Health of the USSR 7.07.77.

9. Guidelines for the sanitary and microbiological study of soil No. 1446-76. Approved Ministry of Health of the USSR 4.08.76.

10. Guidelines for the sanitary and microbiological study of soil No. 2293-81. Approved Ministry of Health of the USSR 19.02.81.

11. Guidelines for helminthological examination of objects external environment and sanitary measures to protect against pollution by helminth eggs and neutralize them from sewage, soil, berries, vegetables, household items No. 1440-76. Approved Ministry of health of the USSR.

12. Guidelines according to geochemical assessment of pollution of urban areas chemical elements. - M.: IMGRE, 1982.

13. List of maximum allowable concentrations (MPC) of chemicals in soil No. 6229-91. Approved Ministry of Health of the USSR 11/19/91.

14 . Approximately permissible concentrations (APC) of heavy metals and arsenic in soils: GN 2.1.7.020-94 (Addendum No. 1 to the list of MPC and AEC No. 6229-92). Approved GKSEN RF 27.12.94.

15. Guidelines for assessing the degree of pollution of atmospheric air in settlements with metals by their content in the snow cover and soil No. 5174-90. Approved Ministry of Health of the USSR 15.05.90.

16 . Guidelines for the fight against flies No. 28-6.3. Approved Ministry of Health of the USSR 01/27/84.

18 . Maximum Permissible Concentrations of Chemical Substances in Soil (MPC): Ministry of Health of the USSR. - M., 1979, 1980, 1982, 1985, 1987.

19. Method for measuring the mass fraction of acid-soluble forms of metals (copper, lead, zinc, nickel, cadmium) in soil samples by atomic absorption analysis: Guidelines: RD 52.18.191-89. Approved SCCM USSR. - M., 1989.

20. Dmitriev M.T., Kaznina N.I., Pinigina I.A.: Handbook: Sanitary-chemical analysis of pollutants in the environment. - M.: Chemistry, 1989.

21. Methods of soil microbiology and biochemistry./ Ed. prof. D.G. Zvyagintsev. - M.: MGU, 1980.

22 . GOST 26204-84, 26213-84 “Soils. Methods of Analysis".

23. GOST 26207-91 “Soils. Determination of mobile forms of phosphorus and potassium by the method of Kirsanov in the modification of TsINAO.

24 . The procedure for determining the parameters of damage from land pollution by chemicals. Approved Chairman of the Federation Committee on Land Resources and Land Management 11/10/93 Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources 11/18/93. Agreed by: 1st Deputy Minister of Agriculture of the Russian Federation on September 6, 1993, Chairman of the RF SCSEN on September 14, 1993 and President Russian Academy Agricultural Sciences 8.09.93.